Manufacturing ERP & Shop-Floor Software
We build the systems factories actually run on — order receipt to shipment, every stage tracked live, every statutory document generated from the same data instead of retyped into a spreadsheet.
8+ yrs
Manufacturing domain experience
Order→Ship
Full lifecycle coverage
1-click
E-way bill generation
Multi-site
Factories, branches, warehouses
Most software companies that say they “do ERP” have integrated a payment gateway and built a CRM. They have never stood on a cutting floor at 6pm working out why a batch card says 480 pieces and the bundle tickets add up to 472. We have. Our team carries 8+ years of hands-on experience across the full manufacturing lifecycle — building, deploying and then living with the systems that run real factories day after day.
That matters because a manufacturing ERP is not a data-entry application. It is an operating model. The order that merchandising confirms has to survive costing, material planning, purchase, inward inspection, issue to floor, cutting, assembly, quality, finishing, audit, packing and dispatch — and at every one of those handoffs there is a chance for quantity, cost or delivery date to quietly drift. Software that only records what happened is useless. Software that reconciles across stages and flags the drift the same day is what protects a margin.
We build custom manufacturing systems for factories that have outgrown spreadsheets and Tally, and for factories stuck on rigid off-the-shelf ERP that cannot model how they actually work. Single plant or fifteen, one location or a group with warehouses and branches in different states — the architecture is designed for it from the start.
The Problems That Actually Cost Factories Money
None of these show up in a software demo. All of them show up in a monthly P&L.
Nobody can answer “where is order 4471?”
The merchant says stitching, the floor says half of it is still at cutting, and the warehouse is sure it dispatched something. Three people spend an hour on WhatsApp reconstructing a status that a system should have shown in one screen.
Costing is done once and never checked again
The cost sheet approved at order confirmation is never compared against what materials were actually consumed and what labour the order actually absorbed. Loss-making styles get repeated because nobody closed the loop.
Material shortages discovered at cutting
Requirement was calculated on a spreadsheet, the purchase order missed an item, and it surfaces the morning the lay is supposed to go down. The line stops and the delivery date moves.
Store stock and system stock never agree
Without disciplined goods inward, goods received and goods dispatch notes tied to the same document trail, physical stock and book stock diverge until the annual count turns into a write-off negotiation.
Statutory paperwork is manual and slow
Delivery challans, invoices, packing lists and e-way bills get keyed in a second time on a government portal. It takes hours per dispatch and every retype is a chance to enter a wrong value that later has to be amended.
Delivery slips before anyone is warned
Without a live time-and-action calendar, a two-day delay at fabric inward is invisible until it has become a two-week delay at shipment — by which point the only remaining option is air freight at the factory's cost.
Every Module a Factory Actually Needs
Not a feature list copied from a brochure — this is the module set we have built, integrated and supported in live production environments.
Order Receiving & Sales Order
Buyer, style, colour, size ratio, quantity, delivery window and terms captured once and carried through every downstream module. Amendments are versioned so the original commitment is never lost.
Merchandising
The merchant's control room: style-wise order status, buyer communication trail, sample stage tracking, approval milestones and a single view of everything at risk this week.
Cost Sheet & Costing
Structured pre-costing across material, trims, labour, overhead, wastage and margin — then post-costing against real consumption and real production output so variance is visible per style, not per year.
Material Requirement (MRL / BOM)
Bill of materials exploded to order quantity with wastage allowance, then netted off against existing stock and open purchase orders so procurement only buys the shortfall.
Purchase Order (PO)
Supplier-wise POs raised straight from the requirement, with rate, delivery date, terms and approval workflow — plus open-PO ageing so late supplier commitments are chased before they stop a line.
Goods Inward Note (GIN)
Material arriving at the gate is booked against its purchase order with quantity, lot and supplier document reference — creating the audit trail that every later reconciliation depends on.
Goods Received Note (GRN)
Post-inspection acceptance: accepted, rejected and short quantities recorded against the inward, with shade, lot and roll or hide detail captured at the level the material demands.
Goods Dispatch Note (GDN)
Controlled issue of material from store to factory floor, department or another unit — so consumption is tied to an order and an operation instead of vanishing into a general issue.
Cutting & Issue to Batch
Lay planning, cut quantity capture, bundle or batch creation and controlled issue to the line, so downstream output can be reconciled against what was genuinely cut and issued.
Stitching / Assembly Tracking
Operation- and line-wise progress against the issued batch, with hourly or shift-wise capture — turning “the line is running” into an actual number a planner can act on.
In-Line QC, Final QC & Audit
Defect capture by type at in-line and final quality stages, rework routing, and a separate inspection audit stage so an internal pass and a buyer-standard audit are not confused with each other.
Finishing, Packing & Cartons
Finishing progress, packing against the buyer's ratio, carton and assortment build-up, and packing list generation directly from packed data rather than a separately maintained sheet.
TNA — Live Time & Action
Every task in the order plan carries a planned date, an actual date and a live status. Slippage is surfaced at the task that caused it, while there is still time to recover the shipment date.
Delivery Challan & Invoice
DC, tax invoice and packing list generated from the same dispatch record — consistent quantities and values across all three, with no third re-entry of the same data.
One-Click E-Way Bill
Direct API integration with the e-way bill system. Instead of logging into the portal and re-keying every field for every dispatch, the bill is generated from the invoice in a single click and the number flows straight back onto the document.
Live Dashboards & Reports
Order status, WIP by stage, department load, pending purchase, stock position, quality trend and dispatch performance — for a line supervisor, a merchant and a director, each seeing the cut that is useful to them.
Multi-Unit, Multi-Location, Multi-Branch
Group structures with several factories, warehouses and branch offices modelled properly — inter-unit transfers, unit-wise stock and consolidated group reporting without duplicate masters.
Roles, Approvals & Audit Trail
Granular role-based access so a cutting supervisor, a store keeper and a director each see and change only what they should — with a full change history behind every commercial document.
Order Received to Shipment — Every Handoff Tracked
This is the sequence we build against. Each stage writes data the next stage reads, which is what makes end-to-end reconciliation possible at all.
- 1
Order received & confirmed
Buyer order captured with style, colour, size ratio, quantity, price and delivery window. This record becomes the single reference every later stage is measured against.
Sales OrderStyle MasterDelivery Window - 2
Merchandising & costing
The merchant builds the cost sheet across material, trims, labour and overhead, confirms feasibility against the delivery date, and drives sample and approval milestones.
Cost SheetSample StatusApprovals - 3
Material requirement planning
BOM exploded to order quantity with wastage, then netted against current stock and open purchase orders so only the true shortfall is procured.
MRL / BOMNet Requirement - 4
Purchase & supplier follow-up
Supplier-wise purchase orders raised with rate and required-by date, then tracked by open-PO ageing so late deliveries are chased before they threaten the cut date.
Purchase OrderPO Ageing - 5
Inward & quality acceptance
Material booked in against its PO at the gate, inspected, then accepted or rejected — with lot, shade and roll or hide detail recorded for traceability.
GINGRNInspection Result - 6
Issue to factory
Controlled dispatch of accepted material from store to the floor against a specific order and operation, so consumption can be reconciled later instead of estimated.
GDNMaterial Issue - 7
Cutting & batch issue
Lay and cut quantities captured, bundles or batches created, and issued to the line — establishing the input quantity every downstream output is checked against.
Cut ReportBatch / Bundle Card - 8
Stitching, in-line QC & finishing
Line-wise production capture with in-line defect recording and rework routing, then finishing progress against the same batch reference.
Line OutputDefect LogRework - 9
Final QC, inspection & audit
Final quality clearance followed by a separate inspection audit stage matching buyer standards, so an internal pass is never mistaken for an audit pass.
Final QCAudit Result - 10
Packing & carton build
Packing against the buyer ratio and assortment, cartons built and measured, and the packing list produced directly from packed data.
Packing ListCarton Detail - 11
Dispatch & statutory documents
Delivery challan, tax invoice and e-way bill generated from one dispatch record — the e-way bill raised through the API in a single click rather than re-keyed on the portal.
DCInvoiceE-Way Bill - 12
Shipment & closure
Shipment confirmed against the original order commitment, post-costing run against actual consumption and output, and the variance fed back into how the next order is quoted.
ShipmentPost-CostingVariance
The Engineering Decisions That Make It Work
Reconciliation is the feature, not reporting
Any developer can build a form that saves a cut quantity. The value is in the system knowing that 480 pieces were issued to cutting, 472 bundles reached the line, 468 passed final QC and 465 were packed — and putting that discrepancy in front of a human being on the day it appears rather than in a month-end report nobody reads.
So we design the data model around quantity continuity first. Every movement references the document that authorised it: an issue references a GDN, a GDN references a GRN, a GRN references a GIN, a GIN references a purchase order, and the purchase order references the order requirement. That chain is what allows the system to answer questions like “which order absorbed this material?” and “why is this style's actual consumption 6% above the cost sheet?” without a manual investigation.
- Document-linked movements — no floating stock adjustments without a reference
- Stage-wise variance surfaced automatically, not on request
- Post-costing against real consumption, feeding the next quotation
- Immutable audit trail on every commercial document
TNA is where delays get caught — or missed
A time-and-action calendar only earns its keep if it is fed by real transactions rather than typed in by a coordinator every Monday. We wire TNA task completion to the operational events that already happen — the GRN posting, the cut report, the final QC clearance — so the calendar reflects the floor without anyone maintaining it as a separate job.
The important behaviour is forward propagation. When fabric inward lands three days late, the system does not just mark one task red; it shows the effect on cut date, line loading and shipment date, so a merchant can decide in week two whether to re-plan the line or negotiate the delivery. Discovering the same problem in week eight leaves only expensive options.
- Tasks completed by real transactions, not manual ticks
- Forward impact on downstream dates shown immediately
- Exception views: what is late, what is about to be late, what is blocked
- Buyer-wise and style-wise views for merchants; line-wise for planners
E-way bills, and why one click matters more than it sounds
Generating an e-way bill by hand means logging into the government portal, re-entering consignor, consignee, invoice, HSN, value, distance and transport details, and copying the resulting number back onto the paperwork. On a factory dispatching many consignments a day, that is hours of skilled time per week spent retyping data the ERP already holds — and every retype is an opportunity to enter a wrong value that later needs an amendment.
We integrate directly with the e-way bill API. The invoice already contains every required field, so the bill is raised from within the system in a single action and the returned number and validity flow straight back onto the delivery challan and invoice. The staff time disappears, the data matches across all three documents by construction, and the dispatch is not held at the gate waiting for paperwork.
- API-based generation — no portal login, no re-keying
- Number and validity written back onto DC and invoice automatically
- Consistent values across challan, invoice, packing list and e-way bill
- Cancellation and amendment handled from the same screen
Built to survive a real factory environment
Factory software fails for unglamorous reasons: the store terminal is on a weak wireless link, the supervisor entering production is not a computer user, the plant runs a second shift after the IT person has gone home, and month-end reporting hits the same database that the cutting floor is writing to. We design for those conditions rather than for a demo.
That means screens built for speed and for a scanner rather than for a mouse, background processing for anything heavy so a report never blocks a transaction, message queues so a slow external API can never stall a shop-floor save, and deployments that go out without taking the system down mid-shift. It is the same infrastructure discipline described on our Docker & Kubernetes and RabbitMQ pages, applied where downtime costs production.
- Scanner- and keyboard-first data entry for shop-floor speed
- Asynchronous processing so external APIs can never block a save
- Zero-downtime deployments — no update window in the middle of a shift
- Reporting isolated from transactional load
When a custom ERP is the wrong answer
We would rather tell you this before a project than during one. Custom manufacturing software is the right call when your process is a genuine competitive advantage, when an off-the-shelf package would force you to change how you actually run, or when you have outgrown spreadsheets and need real multi-user control. It is the wrong call in a few specific situations:
- You are a single small unit with simple, stable processes and a packaged product covers 90% of them — buy the package.
- Your immediate problem is only statutory accounting and GST filing. That is a solved problem; a custom build is an expensive way to get there.
- Nobody internally owns the process. Software cannot enforce a discipline that no manager is willing to hold people to — the data will be wrong within a month.
- You need it live in three weeks. A real ERP rollout is phased; anyone promising a full factory go-live in weeks is selling you a rewrite six months later.
The Technology We Build This On
Backend
Frontend
Database
Infrastructure
Quality & Delivery
Integrations
Frequently Asked Questions
Both. Our team has 8+ years of hands-on experience across the full manufacturing lifecycle — order receiving, merchandising, costing, material planning, purchase, warehouse (GIN/GRN/GDN), cutting, stitching, quality, finishing, packing, dispatch and shipment — building and then supporting the systems that run those processes in live factories. That is why our discovery conversations are about your actual bottleneck rather than a generic requirements template.
Related Expertise
Garment & Apparel Manufacturing
Leather garments, woven garments and leather accessories — the specifics that generic ERP gets wrong.
Python & Django
The backend we build transactional manufacturing systems on.
Angular Development
Data-dense enterprise front-ends for shop-floor and back-office users.
Docker & Kubernetes
Zero-downtime deployment so updates never interrupt a shift.
Microsoft SQL Server
Working with existing plant databases without forcing a migration.
Custom Software Development
How we scope, price and deliver systems built around your process.
Talk to Someone Who Has Actually Run a Factory Floor
Tell us where your process leaks — costing, material, WIP visibility, dispatch paperwork — and we'll tell you honestly whether it needs custom software, an integration, or just a change in how the existing system is used.
Serving startups, factories and enterprises across India, the US, UK, Australia & Europe.